Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add discourse #75

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jan 20, 2025
Merged

add discourse #75

merged 12 commits into from
Jan 20, 2025

Conversation

mehdi-torabiv
Copy link
Collaborator

@mehdi-torabiv mehdi-torabiv commented Jan 16, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Added support for Discourse as a new identity provider
    • Introduced new verification steps for Discourse attestation
    • Enhanced API endpoints for Discourse verification
  • Improvements

    • Refined error handling in API services
    • Updated query configuration for better data fetching
    • Improved TypeScript configuration for better module resolution
  • Technical Updates

    • Added new mutation hooks for Discourse token generation and topic verification
    • Expanded identifier options in user profile

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The head commit changed during the review from 79e98ff to 9b1f2ce.

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces comprehensive support for the Discourse provider in an attestation system. The changes span multiple files, adding a new provider to the enum, creating new step components for the Discourse attestation flow, implementing API endpoints and mutation hooks for Discourse verification, and updating the identifiers page to include the Discourse option. The implementation covers token generation, topic URL verification, and delegation signing for Discourse-based attestations.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/enums/index.ts Added Discourse enum entry to Provider
src/pages/Identifiers/Attestation/Attestation.tsx Added Discourse-specific steps and rendering logic
src/pages/Identifiers/Identifiers.tsx Added Discourse identifier to userIdentifiers
src/services/api/eas/index.ts Added interfaces and methods for Discourse verification
src/services/api/eas/query.ts Added mutation hooks for Discourse verification
src/components/pages/attestations/ Created new step components: DiscourseStepOne, DiscourseStepTwo, DiscourseStepThree, DiscourseStepFour

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant DiscourseStepOne
    participant DiscourseStepTwo
    participant DiscourseStepThree
    participant DiscourseStepFour
    
    User->>DiscourseStepOne: Generate Verification Token
    DiscourseStepOne-->>User: Token Generated
    User->>DiscourseStepTwo: Verify Topic URL
    DiscourseStepTwo-->>User: URL Verified
    User->>DiscourseStepThree: Generate Signed Delegation
    DiscourseStepThree-->>User: Delegation Signed
    User->>DiscourseStepFour: Attest by Delegation
    DiscourseStepFour-->>User: Attestation Complete
Loading

Poem

🐰 A Discourse of Delight, a Rabbit's Might!
Tokens flying, verification so bright
Steps dancing, one through four
Attestation knocking at the door
CodeRabbit's magic takes its flight! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Deploying identity-on-chain-platform with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 9b1f2ce
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://15f6d9b9.identity-on-chain-platform.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://feat-discourse.identity-on-chain-platform.pages.dev

View logs

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 9

🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
src/services/api/eas/index.ts (1)

64-78: Consider adding error handling for invalid URLs.

The verifyDiscourseTopic function accepts a URL parameter but doesn't validate it. Consider adding URL validation before making the API call.

 export const verifyDiscourseTopic = async ({
   topicUrl,
   verificationJwt,
 }: VerifyDiscourseTopicParams) => {
+  try {
+    new URL(topicUrl); // Validate URL format
+  } catch (e) {
+    throw new Error('Invalid topic URL format');
+  }
   return api.post('/discourse-verification/verify', {
     topicUrl,
     verificationJwt,
   });
 };
src/services/api/index.ts (1)

64-71: Add safer error message access pattern.

The current error message access could be made more robust to prevent potential undefined access errors.

       showSnackbar(
-        `${error.response?.data?.message?.message || 'Internal server error'}`,
+        error.response?.data?.message?.message 
+          ?? error.response?.data?.message 
+          ?? error.message 
+          ?? 'Internal server error',
         {
           severity: 'error',
           duration: 5000,
           position: { vertical: 'bottom', horizontal: 'right' },
         }
       );
src/components/pages/attestations/Discourse/StepThree.tsx (1)

31-36: Strengthen token validation.

The current implementation only checks for token existence. Consider adding validation for token format and expiration.

 const handleGenerateSignedDelegation = async () => {
   const siweJwt = localStorage.getItem('OCI_TOKEN');
-  if (!siweJwt || !provider) return;
+  if (!siweJwt || !provider) {
+    showSnackbar('Missing required tokens. Please start over.', {
+      severity: 'error',
+    });
+    return;
+  }
 
   const anyJwt = localStorage.getItem('DISCOURSE_JWT') as string;
+  try {
+    const decodedJwt = jwtDecode(anyJwt);
+    if (decodedJwt.exp && Date.now() >= decodedJwt.exp * 1000) {
+      showSnackbar('Token has expired. Please start over.', {
+        severity: 'error',
+      });
+      return;
+    }
+  } catch (error) {
+    showSnackbar('Invalid token format. Please start over.', {
+      severity: 'error',
+    });
+    return;
+  }
src/components/pages/attestations/Discourse/StepFour.tsx (1)

51-51: Consider making navigation path configurable.

The navigation path is hardcoded. Consider making it configurable or using a constant.

+const IDENTIFIERS_PATH = '/identifiers';
+
 const StepFour: React.FC<StepFourProps> = ({ attestedSignutare }) => {
   // ...
-  navigate('/identifiers');
+  navigate(IDENTIFIERS_PATH);
src/pages/Identifiers/Attestation/Attestation.tsx (1)

50-93: Extract duplicated Paper component styling.

The Paper component's styling is duplicated between the Discourse and non-Discourse renders. Consider extracting it into a shared constant or component.

+const paperStyles = {
+  height: 'calc(100vh - 140px)',
+  p: 2,
+  borderRadius: 4,
+  backgroundColor: 'white',
+  border: '1px solid rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05)',
+  boxShadow: '0px 4px 4px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05)',
+};

 if (provider === Provider.Discourse) {
   return (
     <>
       <CustomBreadcrumb breadcrumbs={breadcrumbs} className="pb-3" />
-      <Paper
-        sx={{
-          height: 'calc(100vh - 140px)',
-          p: 2,
-          borderRadius: 4,
-          backgroundColor: 'white',
-          border: '1px solid rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05)',
-          boxShadow: '0px 4px 4px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05)',
-        }}
+      <Paper
+        sx={paperStyles}
         variant="elevation"
         elevation={0}
       >
src/components/pages/attestations/Discourse/StepTwo.tsx (1)

98-104: Simplify URL validation pattern.

The current URL regex pattern is overly complex. Consider using a simpler pattern or a URL validation library.

-              pattern: {
-                value:
-                  /^(https?:\/\/(?:www\.)?(?:[-a-zA-Z0-9@:%._+~#=]{1,256}\.[a-zA-Z0-9()]{1,6}\b)(?:[-a-zA-Z0-9()@:%_+.~#?&//=]*))$/,
-                message: 'Please enter a valid URL',
-              },
+              validate: (value) => {
+                try {
+                  new URL(value);
+                  return true;
+                } catch {
+                  return 'Please enter a valid URL';
+                }
+              },
src/pages/Identifiers/Identifiers.tsx (1)

130-133: Use a constant for the delay duration.

Extract the hardcoded delay value into a named constant for better maintainability.

+const REVOCATION_DELAY_MS = 2000;
+
 const revokeDelegation = async (response: RevokePayload, uid: string) => {
   // ...
-      await new Promise((resolve) => {
-        setTimeout(resolve, 2000);
-      });
+      await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, REVOCATION_DELAY_MS));
   // ...
 };
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e71e426 and a15df17.

📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • src/components/pages/attestations/Discourse/StepFour.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/pages/attestations/Discourse/StepOne.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/pages/attestations/Discourse/StepThree.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/pages/attestations/Discourse/StepTwo.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/enums/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/pages/Identifiers/Attestation/Attestation.tsx (3 hunks)
  • src/pages/Identifiers/Identifiers.tsx (3 hunks)
  • src/services/api/eas/index.ts (2 hunks)
  • src/services/api/eas/query.ts (2 hunks)
  • src/services/api/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/services/eas/query.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: test/node 17/ubuntu-latest
src/pages/Identifiers/Attestation/Attestation.tsx

[failure] 5-5:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/StepFour' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 6-6:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/StepOne' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 7-7:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/StepThree' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 8-8:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/StepTwo' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 9-9:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/StepOne' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 10-10:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/StepThree' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 11-11:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/StepTwo' or its corresponding type declarations.

🪛 GitHub Check: test/node 18/ubuntu-latest
src/pages/Identifiers/Attestation/Attestation.tsx

[failure] 5-5:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/StepFour' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 6-6:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/StepOne' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 7-7:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/StepThree' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 8-8:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/StepTwo' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 9-9:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/StepOne' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 10-10:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/StepThree' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 11-11:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/StepTwo' or its corresponding type declarations.

🪛 GitHub Actions: on-chain-platform-ci
src/pages/Identifiers/Attestation/Attestation.tsx

[error] 5-5: Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/StepFour' or its corresponding type declarations

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/enums/index.ts (1)

4-4: LGTM! Clean enum addition.

The new Discourse provider enum follows the established naming and value pattern.

src/services/api/eas/index.ts (1)

21-28: LGTM! Well-structured interfaces.

The new interfaces are clearly defined and follow TypeScript best practices.

src/services/api/index.ts (1)

62-62: LGTM! Improved error handling.

Good decision to remove automatic redirect on 400 errors, as not all bad requests require re-authentication.

src/services/api/eas/query.ts (2)

59-68: LGTM! The mutation hook follows the established pattern.

The implementation is clean and consistent with other mutation hooks in the file.


70-80: LGTM! The mutation hook follows the established pattern.

The implementation is clean and consistent with other mutation hooks in the file.

src/components/pages/attestations/Discourse/StepFour.tsx (1)

39-60: LGTM! Proper error handling implementation.

The error handling is well implemented with:

  • Proper error checks
  • User feedback via snackbar
  • Loading state management
  • Error logging
src/pages/Identifiers/Attestation/Attestation.tsx (1)

23-28: LGTM! Well-structured step definitions.

The Discourse steps are logically organized and follow a clear user flow.

Comment on lines +60 to +62
refetchOnMount: true,
refetchOnWindowFocus: true,
staleTime: 0,
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Review aggressive refetch configuration.

The current configuration might lead to excessive API calls:

  • refetchOnMount: true - Refetches on every mount
  • refetchOnWindowFocus: true - Refetches on window focus
  • staleTime: 0 - Marks data as immediately stale

Consider adding a reasonable staleTime (e.g., 30 seconds) to prevent unnecessary refetches.

   enabled: !!recipient || !chainId,
   refetchOnMount: true,
   refetchOnWindowFocus: true,
-  staleTime: 0,
+  staleTime: 30 * 1000, // 30 seconds
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
refetchOnMount: true,
refetchOnWindowFocus: true,
staleTime: 0,
refetchOnMount: true,
refetchOnWindowFocus: true,
staleTime: 30 * 1000, // 30 seconds

Comment on lines 36 to 38
onError: (error) => {
console.error('Failed to generate token:', error);
},
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance error handling with user feedback.

Currently, errors are only logged to the console. Consider showing a snackbar or error message to inform users when token generation fails.

 onError: (error) => {
   console.error('Failed to generate token:', error);
+  // Use the same snackbar pattern as in StepFour
+  showSnackbar('Failed to generate verification token. Please try again.', {
+    severity: 'error',
+  });
 },

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines 47 to 49
onError: (error) => {
console.error(error);
},
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance error handling with user feedback.

Similar to StepOne, errors are only logged to console without user feedback.

 onError: (error) => {
   console.error(error);
+  showSnackbar('Failed to link identifier. Please try again.', {
+    severity: 'error',
+  });
 },

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines 5 to 8
import DiscourseStepFour from '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/StepFour';
import DiscourseStepOne from '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/StepOne';
import DiscourseStepThree from '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/StepThree';
import DiscourseStepTwo from '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/StepTwo';
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Create the missing Discourse step components.

The static analysis indicates that the Discourse step components are missing. Create these components in the following directory:
src/components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: test/node 17/ubuntu-latest

[failure] 5-5:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/StepFour' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 6-6:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/StepOne' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 7-7:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/StepThree' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 8-8:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/StepTwo' or its corresponding type declarations.

🪛 GitHub Check: test/node 18/ubuntu-latest

[failure] 5-5:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/StepFour' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 6-6:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/StepOne' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 7-7:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/StepThree' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 8-8:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/StepTwo' or its corresponding type declarations.

🪛 GitHub Actions: on-chain-platform-ci

[error] 5-5: Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/StepFour' or its corresponding type declarations

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 6

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/pages/Identifiers/Attestation/Attestation.tsx (1)

5-8: ⚠️ Potential issue

Create the missing Discourse step components.

The build is failing because the Discourse step components are missing. Create these components in the following directory:
src/components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: test/node 18/ubuntu-latest

[failure] 5-5:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/DiscourseStepFour' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 6-6:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/DiscourseStepOne' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 7-7:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/DiscourseStepThree' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 8-8:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/DiscourseStepTwo' or its corresponding type declarations.

🪛 GitHub Actions: on-chain-platform-ci

[error] 5-5: Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/DiscourseStepFour' or its corresponding type declarations

🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
src/components/pages/attestations/Discourse/DiscourseStepTwo.tsx (2)

102-104: Strengthen URL validation pattern.

The current URL validation pattern could be more specific to Discourse URLs. Consider adding validation for:

  1. Known Discourse domain patterns
  2. Topic URL path structure

129-134: Add loading state for copy operation.

The copy button should show a loading state during the clipboard operation to prevent multiple clicks.

-                <Tooltip title="Copy to clipboard">
-                  <IconButton onClick={copyToClipboard}>
-                    <ContentCopyIcon />
-                  </IconButton>
-                </Tooltip>
+                <Tooltip title={copying ? 'Copying...' : 'Copy to clipboard'}>
+                  <IconButton 
+                    onClick={copyToClipboard}
+                    disabled={copying}
+                  >
+                    {copying ? <CircularProgress size={20} /> : <ContentCopyIcon />}
+                  </IconButton>
+                </Tooltip>
src/components/pages/attestations/Discourse/DiscourseStepFour.tsx (1)

97-99: Enhance gas fee information.

The gas fee notice could be more informative:

-      <Typography variant="caption">
-        You need to pay some <b>gas</b> to complete the process.
-      </Typography>
+      <Typography variant="caption">
+        This operation requires a blockchain transaction. You'll need to pay gas fees 
+        in your wallet's native currency to complete the attestation.
+      </Typography>
src/pages/Identifiers/Attestation/Attestation.tsx (3)

23-28: Consider adding descriptions to the Discourse steps.

To improve user experience, consider adding descriptions to each step to help users understand what to expect. For example:

 const discourseSteps = [
-  { label: 'Generate Token' },
-  { label: 'Verify Topic URL' },
-  { label: 'Attest' },
-  { label: 'Complete' },
+  { 
+    label: 'Generate Token',
+    description: 'Generate a unique verification token for your Discourse account'
+  },
+  {
+    label: 'Verify Topic URL',
+    description: 'Provide the URL of your verification topic'
+  },
+  {
+    label: 'Attest',
+    description: 'Sign your attestation'
+  },
+  {
+    label: 'Complete',
+    description: 'View your completed attestation'
+  },
 ];

Line range hint 33-34: Fix typo in variable name.

The variable name attestedSignutare contains a typo. It should be attestedSignature.

-const [attestedSignutare, setAttestedSignature] =
+const [attestedSignature, setAttestedSignature] =
   useState<AttestPayload | null>(null);
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: test/node 18/ubuntu-latest

[failure] 5-5:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/DiscourseStepFour' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 6-6:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/DiscourseStepOne' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 7-7:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/DiscourseStepThree' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 8-8:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/DiscourseStepTwo' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 9-9:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/StepOne' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 10-10:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/StepThree' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 11-11:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/StepTwo' or its corresponding type declarations.

🪛 GitHub Actions: on-chain-platform-ci

[error] 5-5: Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/DiscourseStepFour' or its corresponding type declarations


50-93: Consider adding error boundaries for Discourse steps.

The Discourse attestation flow involves multiple API calls and user interactions. Consider wrapping the step components with error boundaries to gracefully handle potential failures.

import { ErrorBoundary } from 'react-error-boundary';

function StepErrorFallback({ error, resetErrorBoundary }) {
  return (
    <Alert severity="error">
      <AlertTitle>Error</AlertTitle>
      {error.message}
      <Button onClick={resetErrorBoundary}>Try again</Button>
    </Alert>
  );
}

// Usage in render:
<ErrorBoundary FallbackComponent={StepErrorFallback}>
  {activeStep === 0 && (
    <DiscourseStepOne
      handleNextStep={() => setActiveStep((prev) => prev + 1)}
    />
  )}
</ErrorBoundary>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a15df17 and 8a882da.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • src/components/pages/attestations/Discourse/DiscourseStepFour.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/pages/attestations/Discourse/DiscourseStepOne.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/pages/attestations/Discourse/DiscourseStepThree.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/pages/attestations/Discourse/DiscourseStepTwo.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/pages/Identifiers/Attestation/Attestation.tsx (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: test/node 18/ubuntu-latest
src/pages/Identifiers/Attestation/Attestation.tsx

[failure] 5-5:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/DiscourseStepFour' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 6-6:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/DiscourseStepOne' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 7-7:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/DiscourseStepThree' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 8-8:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/DiscourseStepTwo' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 9-9:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/StepOne' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 10-10:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/StepThree' or its corresponding type declarations.


[failure] 11-11:
Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/StepTwo' or its corresponding type declarations.

🪛 GitHub Actions: on-chain-platform-ci
src/pages/Identifiers/Attestation/Attestation.tsx

[error] 5-5: Cannot find module '../../../components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/DiscourseStepFour' or its corresponding type declarations

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages

Comment on lines 30 to 37
localStorage.setItem(
'DISCOURSE_VERIFICATION_TOKEN',
data.verificationJwt
);

const { code } = jwtDecode(data.verificationJwt) as { code: string };
localStorage.setItem('DISCOURSE_VERIFICATION_CODE', code);

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Consider secure token storage alternatives.

Storing sensitive tokens in localStorage poses security risks as it's vulnerable to XSS attacks. Consider using more secure alternatives:

  1. Use session storage for temporary tokens
  2. Implement secure cookie storage with httpOnly flag
  3. Use a secure token management service

Comment on lines 41 to 42
console.error('Failed to generate token:', error);
showSnackbar(
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Avoid logging sensitive error information.

Console logging error details could expose sensitive information in production.

-          console.error('Failed to generate token:', error);
+          console.error('Failed to generate token');
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
console.error('Failed to generate token:', error);
showSnackbar(
console.error('Failed to generate token');
showSnackbar(

Comment on lines 27 to 29
const { mutate: mutateIdentifier, isPending } = useLinkIdentifierMutation(
chainId as number
);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add chainId validation.

The type assertion on chainId could lead to runtime errors. Consider adding proper validation:

-  const { mutate: mutateIdentifier, isPending } = useLinkIdentifierMutation(
-    chainId as number
-  );
+  if (!chainId) {
+    throw new Error('Chain ID is required');
+  }
+  const { mutate: mutateIdentifier, isPending } = useLinkIdentifierMutation(chainId);
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const { mutate: mutateIdentifier, isPending } = useLinkIdentifierMutation(
chainId as number
);
if (!chainId) {
throw new Error('Chain ID is required');
}
const { mutate: mutateIdentifier, isPending } = useLinkIdentifierMutation(chainId);

Comment on lines 35 to 36
const anyJwt = localStorage.getItem('DISCOURSE_JWT') as string;

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

JWT validation required before usage in critical operations

The JWT retrieved from localStorage is used in a security-critical attestation signing operation without any validation. Implement token validation before using it in the handleGenerateSignedDelegation function to ensure the token is valid, not expired, and hasn't been tampered with.

  • src/components/pages/attestations/Discourse/DiscourseStepThree.tsx: Add validation before using anyJwt in mutateIdentifier
🔗 Analysis chain

Validate JWT before usage.

The JWT from localStorage should be validated before use.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for JWT validation in the codebase
rg -l "jwt.*validate|validate.*jwt|verify.*jwt|jwt.*verify" --type ts

Length of output: 71


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for JWT-related code and DISCOURSE_JWT usage
echo "=== JWT and Token Patterns ==="
rg "jwt|token" --type ts -i -l

echo -e "\n=== DISCOURSE_JWT Usage ==="
rg "DISCOURSE_JWT" --type ts -A 5

echo -e "\n=== Authentication/Verification Patterns ==="
rg "verify|validate|check.*token|isValid|authenticate" --type ts -l

Length of output: 2473


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation details of key components

echo "=== DiscourseStepThree Implementation ==="
rg -A 10 "mutateIdentifier" src/components/pages/attestations/Discourse/DiscourseStepThree.tsx

echo -e "\n=== Auth Service Implementation ==="
cat src/services/api/auth/index.ts

echo -e "\n=== API Service JWT Usage ==="
rg -A 5 "anyJwt|discourseJwt" src/services/api/

Length of output: 2601

Comment on lines 33 to 35
const easContractAddress = contracts.find(
(contract) => contract.chainId === chainId
)?.easContractAddress;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add contract address validation.

The contract address should be validated before use. Consider adding proper validation:

   const easContractAddress = contracts.find(
     (contract) => contract.chainId === chainId
   )?.easContractAddress;
+  if (!easContractAddress) {
+    throw new Error(`No EAS contract address found for chain ID ${chainId}`);
+  }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const easContractAddress = contracts.find(
(contract) => contract.chainId === chainId
)?.easContractAddress;
const easContractAddress = contracts.find(
(contract) => contract.chainId === chainId
)?.easContractAddress;
if (!easContractAddress) {
throw new Error(`No EAS contract address found for chain ID ${chainId}`);
}

Comment on lines 54 to 59
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error attesting identifier:', error);
showSnackbar('Failed to complete the attestation. Please try again.', {
severity: 'error',
});
} finally {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve error handling specificity.

The error handling should be more specific to help users understand and resolve issues:

     } catch (error) {
-      console.error('Error attesting identifier:', error);
-      showSnackbar('Failed to complete the attestation. Please try again.', {
+      const errorMessage = error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error occurred';
+      console.error('Error attesting identifier:', errorMessage);
+      showSnackbar(`Failed to complete the attestation: ${errorMessage}`, {
         severity: 'error',
       });
     }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error attesting identifier:', error);
showSnackbar('Failed to complete the attestation. Please try again.', {
severity: 'error',
});
} finally {
} catch (error) {
const errorMessage = error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error occurred';
console.error('Error attesting identifier:', errorMessage);
showSnackbar(`Failed to complete the attestation: ${errorMessage}`, {
severity: 'error',
});
} finally {

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8a882da and 14bd160.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tsconfig.app.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
tsconfig.app.json

[error] 31-31: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


[error] 31-31: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


[error] 31-39: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: test/node 17/ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages

Comment on lines 31 to 39
"include": [
".prettierrc.cjs",
".eslintrc.cjs",
"src",
"src/**/*.tsx",
"src/**/*.ts",
"src/components/**/*.tsx",
"src/components/**/**/*.ts"
]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Simplify the include patterns to avoid redundancy.

The current include patterns have several redundancies:

  1. src already includes all files under the src directory
  2. The additional patterns for TypeScript files are already covered by the src entry
  3. The component-specific patterns use inconsistent nesting levels (** vs **/**)

Apply this diff to simplify the configuration while maintaining the same coverage:

   "include": [
     ".prettierrc.cjs",
     ".eslintrc.cjs",
-    "src",
-    "src/**/*.tsx",
-    "src/**/*.ts",
-    "src/components/**/*.tsx",
-    "src/components/**/**/*.ts"
+    "src"
   ]

This simplified configuration will still include all TypeScript and TypeScript React files under the src directory and its subdirectories.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
"include": [
".prettierrc.cjs",
".eslintrc.cjs",
"src",
"src/**/*.tsx",
"src/**/*.ts",
"src/components/**/*.tsx",
"src/components/**/**/*.ts"
]
"include": [
".prettierrc.cjs",
".eslintrc.cjs",
"src"
]
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 31-31: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


[error] 31-31: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


[error] 31-39: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 7

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
tsconfig.app.json (1)

31-37: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Simplify the include patterns to avoid redundancy.

The current include patterns have several redundancies:

  1. src already includes all files under the src directory
  2. The additional patterns for TypeScript files are already covered by the src entry

Apply this diff to simplify the configuration while maintaining the same coverage:

   "include": [
     ".prettierrc.cjs",
     ".eslintrc.cjs",
-    "src",
-    "src/**/*.tsx",
-    "src/**/*.ts"
+    "src"
   ]
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 31-31: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


[error] 31-31: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


[error] 31-37: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


[error] 37-37: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)

🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
src/components/pages/attestations/DiscourseStepOne.tsx (1)

40-48: Enhance error handling with specific error messages.

The error handling could be more informative to help users and developers troubleshoot issues.

 onError: (error) => {
-  console.error('Failed to generate token:', error);
+  const errorMessage = error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error occurred';
+  console.error('Failed to generate token:', errorMessage);
   showSnackbar(
-    'Failed to generate verification token. Please try again.',
+    `Failed to generate verification token: ${errorMessage}. Please try again.`,
     {
       severity: 'error',
     }
   );
 }
src/components/pages/attestations/DiscourseStepTwo.tsx (1)

40-51: Improve clipboard operation error handling.

The current implementation doesn't handle specific clipboard API errors or browser compatibility issues.

 const copyToClipboard = async () => {
   try {
-    navigator.clipboard.writeText(verificationCode);
+    if (!navigator.clipboard) {
+      throw new Error('Clipboard API not supported');
+    }
+    await navigator.clipboard.writeText(verificationCode);
     showSnackbar('Verification code copied to clipboard', {
       severity: 'success',
     });
   } catch (error) {
+    const errorMessage = error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error';
     showSnackbar('Failed to copy verification code to clipboard', {
       severity: 'error',
+      description: errorMessage
     });
   }
 };
src/pages/Identifiers/Attestation/Attestation.tsx (4)

Line range hint 33-34: Fix typo in state variable name.

The variable name attestedSignutare contains a typo. It should be attestedSignature.

-  const [attestedSignutare, setAttestedSignature] =
+  const [attestedSignature, setAttestedSignature] =
     useState<AttestPayload | null>(null);

54-65: Reduce code duplication by extracting Paper styles.

The Paper component styles are duplicated. Consider extracting them into a shared constant or styled component.

+const paperStyles = {
+  height: 'calc(100vh - 140px)',
+  p: 2,
+  borderRadius: 4,
+  backgroundColor: 'white',
+  border: '1px solid rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05)',
+  boxShadow: '0px 4px 4px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05)',
+};

 // Then use it in both Paper components:
-<Paper
-  sx={{
-    height: 'calc(100vh - 140px)',
-    p: 2,
-    borderRadius: 4,
-    backgroundColor: 'white',
-    border: '1px solid rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05)',
-    boxShadow: '0px 4px 4px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05)',
-  }}
+<Paper sx={paperStyles}

Also applies to: 97-108


50-93: Add info alert for Discourse attestation flow.

The Discourse flow is missing the informative alert that exists in the default flow. Consider adding a similar alert to maintain consistency in user experience.

   if (provider === Provider.Discourse) {
     return (
       <>
         <CustomBreadcrumb breadcrumbs={breadcrumbs} className="pb-3" />
         <Paper sx={paperStyles} variant="elevation" elevation={0}>
+          <Alert severity="info" sx={{ mb: 4 }}>
+            <AlertTitle>Link Your Discourse Account</AlertTitle>
+            Attest your Discourse account by linking it to your wallet address.
+            This allows you to prove ownership of your Discourse profile.
+          </Alert>
           <CustomStepper steps={discourseSteps} activeStep={activeStep} />

88-88: Update prop name to match the corrected state variable.

Update the prop name to match the corrected state variable name.

-            <DiscourseStepFour attestedSignutare={attestedSignutare} />
+            <DiscourseStepFour attestedSignature={attestedSignature} />
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 14bd160 and aaa0b37.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • src/components/pages/attestations/DiscourseStepFour.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/pages/attestations/DiscourseStepOne.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/pages/attestations/DiscourseStepThree.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/pages/attestations/DiscourseStepTwo.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/pages/Identifiers/Attestation/Attestation.tsx (3 hunks)
  • tsconfig.app.json (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
tsconfig.app.json

[error] 13-13: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


[error] 13-13: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


[error] 13-13: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


[error] 13-13: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


[error] 31-31: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


[error] 31-31: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


[error] 31-37: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


[error] 37-37: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


[error] 38-38: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


[error] 38-38: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


[error] 38-38: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tsconfig.app.json (2)

38-38: LGTM!

The exclude patterns are standard and correctly specified.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 38-38: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


[error] 38-38: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


[error] 38-38: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


[error] 38-39: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


13-13: Verify the impact of changing moduleResolution to "node".

Changing from "bundler" to "node" moduleResolution strategy could affect how modules are resolved, particularly for the new Discourse-related components. Please ensure this change doesn't break existing imports or cause resolution issues.

Run this script to check for potential module resolution issues:

✅ Verification successful

The moduleResolution change to "node" is safe to proceed with

The change aligns well with the project's ESM setup and modern dependency usage. The path aliases are properly configured, and no problematic import patterns were found in the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential module resolution issues
# Look for import statements that might be affected by the moduleResolution change

# Search for import statements using path aliases
rg "^import.*from.*@/" -t ts -t tsx

# Search for relative imports that might be affected
rg "^import.*from.*\.\." -t ts -t tsx

Length of output: 133


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for path mappings and module resolution settings in all tsconfig files
echo "=== TypeScript Configurations ==="
fd tsconfig --exec cat {}

echo -e "\n=== Package.json Module Configuration ==="
cat package.json | jq '{type,dependencies,devDependencies}'

echo -e "\n=== Import Statements Analysis ==="
# Search for imports using correct file type
rg "^import .* from ['\"]" -g "*.ts"

echo -e "\n=== Path Alias Usage (@) ==="
rg "@/" -g "*.ts"

Length of output: 7505

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 13-13: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


[error] 13-13: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


[error] 13-13: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)


[error] 13-13: End of file expected

Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]

(parse)

src/pages/Identifiers/Attestation/Attestation.tsx (2)

5-8: Create the missing Discourse step components.

The imports reference Discourse step components that don't exist yet. Create these components in the following directory:
src/components/pages/Attestations/Discourse/


23-28: LGTM! Well-structured step definitions.

The Discourse steps are clearly defined with descriptive labels that follow a logical flow.

Comment on lines +30 to +33
localStorage.setItem(
'DISCOURSE_VERIFICATION_TOKEN',
data.verificationJwt
);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Consider secure token storage alternatives.

Storing sensitive tokens in localStorage poses security risks as it's vulnerable to XSS attacks. Consider using more secure alternatives:

  1. Use session storage for temporary tokens
  2. Implement token encryption before storage
  3. Store only non-sensitive parts of the token

Also applies to: 35-36

Comment on lines +101 to +105
pattern: {
value:
/^(https?:\/\/(?:www\.)?(?:[-a-zA-Z0-9@:%._+~#=]{1,256}\.[a-zA-Z0-9()]{1,6}\b)(?:[-a-zA-Z0-9()@:%_+.~#?&//=]*))$/,
message: 'Please enter a valid URL',
},
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Strengthen URL validation pattern.

The current URL validation pattern might allow potentially malicious URLs. Consider using a more restrictive pattern that specifically matches Discourse topic URLs.

 pattern: {
   value:
-    /^(https?:\/\/(?:www\.)?(?:[-a-zA-Z0-9@:%._+~#=]{1,256}\.[a-zA-Z0-9()]{1,6}\b)(?:[-a-zA-Z0-9()@:%_+.~#?&//=]*))$/,
+    /^https?:\/\/(?:www\.)?[-a-zA-Z0-9@:%._+~#=]{1,256}\.[a-zA-Z0-9()]{1,6}\/t\/[-a-zA-Z0-9@:%._+~#=]{1,256}\/\d+(?:\/\d+)?$/,
   message: 'Please enter a valid Discourse topic URL',
 },
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
pattern: {
value:
/^(https?:\/\/(?:www\.)?(?:[-a-zA-Z0-9@:%._+~#=]{1,256}\.[a-zA-Z0-9()]{1,6}\b)(?:[-a-zA-Z0-9()@:%_+.~#?&//=]*))$/,
message: 'Please enter a valid URL',
},
pattern: {
value:
/^https?:\/\/(?:www\.)?[-a-zA-Z0-9@:%._+~#=]{1,256}\.[a-zA-Z0-9()]{1,6}\/t\/[-a-zA-Z0-9@:%._+~#=]{1,256}\/\d+(?:\/\d+)?$/,
message: 'Please enter a valid Discourse topic URL',
},

Comment on lines +27 to +29
const { mutate: mutateIdentifier, isPending } = useLinkIdentifierMutation(
chainId as number
);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Avoid unsafe type assertion for chainId.

The current implementation assumes chainId is always a number, which might cause runtime errors.

-  const { mutate: mutateIdentifier, isPending } = useLinkIdentifierMutation(
-    chainId as number
-  );
+  const { mutate: mutateIdentifier, isPending } = useLinkIdentifierMutation(
+    chainId ?? 1 // Provide a fallback chain ID or handle the undefined case
+  );
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const { mutate: mutateIdentifier, isPending } = useLinkIdentifierMutation(
chainId as number
);
const { mutate: mutateIdentifier, isPending } = useLinkIdentifierMutation(
chainId ?? 1 // Provide a fallback chain ID or handle the undefined case
);

Comment on lines +47 to +50
onError: (error) => {
console.error(error);
},
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance error handling with user feedback.

The error handler only logs to console without informing the user about the failure.

 onError: (error) => {
   console.error(error);
+  showSnackbar('Failed to generate signed delegation. Please try again.', {
+    severity: 'error',
+  });
 },

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

const navigate = useNavigate();
const signer = useSigner();
const { chainId } = useAccount();
const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState<boolean>(false);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Implement proper cleanup for loading state.

The loading state should be cleaned up if the component unmounts during the attestation process.

-const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState<boolean>(false);
+const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState<boolean>(false);
+const mounted = useRef(true);
+
+useEffect(() => {
+  return () => {
+    mounted.current = false;
+  };
+}, []);

 const handleAttestByDelegation = async () => {
   // ... existing code ...
   try {
     await easService.attestByDelegation(attestedSignutare);
     showSnackbar('Attestation successfully completed.', {
       severity: 'success',
     });
     navigate('/identifiers');
   } catch (error) {
     console.error('Error attesting identifier:', error);
     showSnackbar('Failed to complete the attestation. Please try again.', {
       severity: 'error',
     });
   } finally {
-    setIsLoading(false);
+    if (mounted.current) {
+      setIsLoading(false);
+    }
   }
 };

Also applies to: 47-61

Comment on lines +20 to +22
interface DiscourseStepFourProps {
attestedSignutare: AttestPayload | null;
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix typo in prop name 'attestedSignutare'.

The prop name contains a typo which should be corrected to maintain code quality.

 interface DiscourseStepFourProps {
-  attestedSignutare: AttestPayload | null;
+  attestedSignature: AttestPayload | null;
 }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
interface DiscourseStepFourProps {
attestedSignutare: AttestPayload | null;
}
interface DiscourseStepFourProps {
attestedSignature: AttestPayload | null;
}

Comment on lines +33 to +35
const easContractAddress = contracts.find(
(contract) => contract.chainId === chainId
)?.easContractAddress;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add validation for chainId existence.

The current implementation doesn't handle the case where no matching contract is found for the chainId.

 const easContractAddress = contracts.find(
   (contract) => contract.chainId === chainId
 )?.easContractAddress;
+
+if (!easContractAddress) {
+  throw new Error(`No contract found for chain ID: ${chainId}`);
+}
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const easContractAddress = contracts.find(
(contract) => contract.chainId === chainId
)?.easContractAddress;
const easContractAddress = contracts.find(
(contract) => contract.chainId === chainId
)?.easContractAddress;
if (!easContractAddress) {
throw new Error(`No contract found for chain ID: ${chainId}`);
}

@mehdi-torabiv mehdi-torabiv merged commit 39e3596 into main Jan 20, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant